"in mischaracterizing paper 1 they created a new latent paper, paper 1', which hasn't been written but exists because it has been referred to" https://social.omar.website/@omar/statuses/01J4T2CPM4NTSH99DDJ2ZF142F
About
"The program should, in some way, expand the concept of what computer paint programs are, as well as what mark making can be."
unrelated but Graphviz aesthetic makes anything feel trustworthy to me https://wandering.shop/@ben_rosenbaum/112876821924387536
Hmm it looks like some sort of fascist flag
video game controller
How I feel whenever I read old papers https://glammr.us/@overholt/112694786223550746
Debugging 3D calibration... had weird issues where it produced homographies with det(H) < 0 which totally messed up the rotation and translation (you'd have a couple calibration poses that have z < 0, so 'behind the camera' or 'behind the projector' and reflected, which I guess makes mathematical sense but not physical sense lol). I just set H = -H and then it fixed everything
All computer vision stuff is like
Step 1. Do some linear algebra that makes logical sense, uses a rational scientific model of how we believe the world works, looks reasonable
Step 2. The result of Step 1 is basically garbage. Feed it into a nonlinear optimizer to make it actually good